http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:36:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-6091 Selina Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:27:28 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-6091 I want to believe they're all film, but I'll happily convert if they're all digital. What camera did you/she use? I want to believe they’re all film, but I’ll happily convert if they’re all digital. What camera did you/she use?

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2481 jan Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:34:39 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2481 She does such beautiful work. Makes digi worth it She does such beautiful work. Makes digi worth it

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2376 elizabeth Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:59:07 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2376 you're a bit late, there ;) you’re a bit late, there

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2363 Lou Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:47:28 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2363 All digital. All digital.

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2328 elizabeth Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:44:24 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2328 If your standard shoot is 30-40 rolls of 120 film, that's over a grand including cost of film and processing/contacts/scans... If your standard shoot is 30-40 rolls of 120 film, that’s over a grand including cost of film and processing/contacts/scans…

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2326 rolo Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2326 Time I understand, but I'm endlessly bewildered by the notion that film doesn't make financial sense. It takes a LOT of film and processing to equal the expense of a quality, full-frame DSLR. And while scanning is slow (TIME), it takes no time at all to make scans look film-like because, well. . . . Time I understand, but I’m endlessly bewildered by the notion that film doesn’t make financial sense. It takes a LOT of film and processing to equal the expense of a quality, full-frame DSLR. And while scanning is slow (TIME), it takes no time at all to make scans look film-like because, well. . . .

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2322 Marc Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:07:07 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2322 C, G, H, and I are film. Rest is digital. C, G, H, and I are film. Rest is digital.

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2321 danb Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:34:33 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2321 wait, and E wait, and E

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2320 danb Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:33:43 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2320 A & H are film, the rest are digital. A & H are film, the rest are digital.

]]> http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/2009/09/interview-and-digital-v-film-quiz-with-elizabeth-weinberg.html/comment-page-1#comment-2315 FETE Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:51:50 +0000 http://www.rachelhulin.com/blog/?p=1208#comment-2315 E&H are film. The rest are digital E&H are film.
The rest are digital

]]>